PRESENT
Philosophy
of psychiatry
Every two weeks, on Thursdays
From January 21st to June 24th
Webinar ended
you can watch recordings in "talks" section
/ about
Philosophy of Psychiatry is an expanding field of research. Well known research topics include the scientificity of Psychiatry, its role and explanatory power, as well as its interactions with neighbouring disciplines such as Psychology, Neuroscience, Sociology, Anthropology, etc. Philosophy of Psychiatry also relates to traditional questions of Philosophy of Science such as ones about models, proof, causality, and categorisation. It brings into consideration some phenomenological approaches to mental condition(s) and their relationship to cognition in general, and to more particular processes and functions such as rationality, agentivity or emotions. Researchers in the field investigate concept(s) or conception(s) of mental disorder compared to neurotypicality, as well as the possible models and conceptualizations of mental health. Philosophy of Psychiatry has also recently been animated by ethical considerations, opening the field to new research topics, such as the validity and usefulness of different diagnostic categories, the merits and limits of the Neurodiversity movement, the integration of patients in psychiatric research and clinics, the tools to find appropriate mental health policies and methodologies, the influence of pharmaceutical companies on psychiatry, the role and limits of values in psychiatric theories and practice, etc.
By investigating these different themes in a philosophical perspective, this Webinar aims to contribute to a better understanding of clinical and theoretical psychiatry. Every two weeks, internationally renowned experts in the field will present their work to the audience, who will then be invited to take part in a discussion.
The webinar will take place on Thursday (Eastern Time), beginning on January 21, 2021. It is freely accessible on Zoom (# of meeting, password and link to be announced).
Organizers:
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
Biomedical Ethics Unit,
McGill University
Canada Research Chair on Epistemic Injustice and Agency
Sarah Arnaud
Université du Québec à Montréal
Canada Research Chair on Epistemic Injustice and Agency
/ program
Every two weeks, on Thursdays, From 12:30 to 2pm (Eastern time)
JANUARY
21ST
Jerome Wakefeild
Title of the talk
MARCH
FEBRUARY
4th
Phoebe Friesen
Title of the talk
APRIL
18TH
Mohammed Abouelleil Rashed
Title of the talk
Ian Gold
Title of the talk
FEBRUARY
18th
Rachel Cooper
Title of the talk
APRIL
15th
Amandine Catala
Title of the talk
MARCH
4th
Serife Tekin
Title of the talk
APRIL
29th
Luc Faucher
Title of the talk
/ program
Every two weeks, on Thursdays, From 12:30 to 2pm (Eastern time)
JANUARY
21ST
Jerome Wakefeild
New York University
Nosology Wars!: The Concept of Disorder and the Future of Psychiatric Classification.
FEBRUARY
4th
Phoebe Friesen
McGill University
Standpoint Theory and the Psy Sciences: Can Marginalization and Critical Engagement Lead to an Epistemic Advantage?
FEBRUARY
18th
Rachel Cooper
Lancaster University, UK
The concept of mental disorder revisited: Robustly value-laden despite conceptual change
MARCH
4th
Serife Tekin
University of Texas at San Antonio
Rethinking Objectivity in Psychiatry: Unmuting Patients in Epistemic Practices
MARCH
18TH
Mohammed Abouelleil Rashed
Welcome ISSF Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy
Birkbeck College, University of London
Desiderata of a Theory of Understanding for the Mental Health Encounter
MAY
13TH
Justin Garson
Hunter College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York
Madness as strategy and mad resistance
APRIL
1St
Ian Gold
McGill University
Experience in Delusion
APRIL
15th
Amandine Catala
Université du Québec à Montréal
Epistemic justice and epistemic authority on autism
APRIL
29th
Luc Faucher
Université du Québec à Montréal
Autism and Epistemic Disablement
MAY
27TH
Camillia Kong
Universty of Oxford
The Phenomenology and Ethics of P-Centricity in Mental Capacity Law
JUNE
10TH
Peter Zachar
Auburn University Montgomery
Operational Definitions, Open Concepts, and the Re-emergence of Nonspecific Psychiatric Distress
JUNE
24TH
Natalia Washington
University of Utah
Square Pegs, Round holes: the problem of ‘naturalized norms’ in accounts of well-being
/contact
CONTACT PERSONS
Sarah Arnaud
Université du Québec à Montréal
sarah.audrey.arnaud @ gmail.com
Anne-Marie Gagné-Julien
Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University
annemariegagnejulien @ gmail.com